Will Mass Directory Submission Get Your Website Into Google Sandbox?

Advertise Here Free

You Can Beat Depression
My True Emotional Journey to Inspire & Help You
  WebTraffic Solutions
Does your web traffic suck? So did mine until...
 

There is an SEO theory which suggests that mass directory submission will get your website into Google sandbox.

The basic idea is if your new website has too many links all of a sudden, usually due to mass submission in a short time, your website will be ‘jailed’ by Google.

Is it true? Let’s find out in this little test that I’ve done.

In my test, I built 3 40-page content websites and then did the following IMMEDIATELY:

- For 2 of the websites, I bookmarked them at Digg and Propeller (as what I usually do to promote new websites) and submit them to 1000 link directories (outsourced).

- For the third website, I only submit them to 1000 link directories. Forgot to submit to Digg and Propeller actually.

After 3 days……

All three websites got indexed in Google, one with 100% of the pages indexed and the other two with 50% indexed.

From my experience, it is unusual that new websites get 100% indexed. Usually, if your website has 40 pages, about 10-20 pages will be indexed initially. I believe this is because there isn’t enough link popularity for the new site.

But in this test, one website got 100% indexed. Is it a coincidence or it’s the effect of 1000 directory submission? Em…

How about the traffic?

There is a surge in traffic to all 3 website in the first few days. This is expected because link directories owners are evaluating the website for listing.

But after 7 days……

One website average about 20 visitors a day and the other two websites average about 40 visitors a day.

Frankly, I like what I’m seeing.

To give you an idea, my other websites with ’slow’ link building process are getting 5 to 10 visitors a day initially. These 3 websites are really having a great start.

Are all the traffic from Google?

Not really. Two websites have most of the search engine traffic from Google. One has most of the search engine traffic from Microsoft Live. Besides search engine traffic, te websites also have traffic from Digg, Propeller and tons of link directories.

The websites are now 2 weeks old and the traffic has been pretty consistent.

From this little test, I’ve yet to see any sandbox effect on these 3 websites as a result of mass directory submission.

On the contrary, I’m seeing Search Engines giving my websites more priority as a result of more initial links.

Will Google ‘jail’ the websites after some time? Well, only time can tell. But I’ll surely keep you informed.

Have you got any similar experience before? Or you ever got your website thrown into Google sandbox as a result of mass link directory submission? Feel free to discuss below.

  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us

Check out these offers from our members:

  • This Pays Into Infinity
    Simple..get an infinite payline and over $5000 of HOT Products FREE
  • WIN At Traffic Generation
    REVEALED The Secrets of Automated Traffic!
  • Download My 363 Gifts!
    You get all 363 gifts valued at $22,411.40 - for FREE!
  • Cashdevelopment
    All the tools and resources marketer need, and make you cash too
  • Wealthy Affiliate Works
    Read the review. Get the tools. FREE report. Excellent.
  • Advertise Here Free

    RSS feed | Trackback URI

    35 Comments »

    2008-05-31 01:32:27

    That’s very interesting information Kenneth. It runs contrary to just about everything I’ve ever heard or been told about building incoming links. I hope you will keep us informed of the sandbox situation. As always great information.

     
    Comment by Paul Perry
    2008-05-31 02:17:55

    Hi Ken
    Thanks for the info,I think any link back to your web site,
    will help with the search engines. The spiders pick every thing up even these few lines Thanks again Paul
    http//www.PerrysClickbox.com

     
    Comment by Chad Flick Subscribed to comments via email
    2008-05-31 02:31:10

    Hey Kenneth,
    The quality of this information can prove to be most useful to ANY internet marketer, from the experienced to the novice. Ive had similar results and use these same techniques in my own marketing in addition to my other promotional efforts. Anyone stumbling onto this post who is a novice will be in for a pleasant learning experience.

     
    Comment by Johan
    2008-05-31 04:13:01

    This sounds very interesting. I will have to test it.
    I learn something new everyday. Never came across anything that made me so excited. This sound amazing.

    Johan

    http://johankruger.blogspot.com
    http://www.hanque.com

     
    Comment by Francois Jooste Subscribed to comments via email
    2008-05-31 04:29:23

    Hi Ken
    Verrryy interesting.
    Please keep us up to date.
    Biz Plans

     
    Comment by Yuri Rul
    2008-05-31 05:33:31

    Dear sirs! And that I should do(make) offer for acquaintance my site: http://yurirul.ru.gg and thus to not be punished the company Google? A thank. Yours faithfully, Yuri Rul.

     
    Comment by Albert Culmer
    2008-05-31 06:55:08

    Hi, Ken, this is Albert Culmer, the one they put in the sandbox. Go by my website and check it out, and maybe you can tell me what I did wrong to get put in the sandbox. It doesn’t feel like sand, it feels like quicksand. Help! The only one that they did not put in the sandbox was a new website that I just started. The website is: http://www.AlbertCulmer.com Now I am fairly new at this, trying to sell on the internet, plus I have dyslexia, which is not good in my favor, but I have a Natural Reader on my computer which does all of my reading for me, so anything you send me I can read, and I do have common sense! I did put everything on my website, that you will see, but then again, I must have made a mistake somewhere. I appreciate all the help I can get from anyone out there. That’s all for now. Thank you.

     
    Comment by Tali bargains
    2008-05-31 08:20:35

    Hey love your test and makes me feel a lot better about mass submissions. I normally do my submissions over 2 weeks rather than over a few days so hopefully that won’t give Google ammunition to play with.

     
    Comment by Gauatm Chaudhury
    2008-05-31 09:54:13

    I need urgent help

     
    2008-05-31 10:29:02

    I believe what you are saying here is 100% true. My site http://www.patongharborview.com has about 1000 pages of content and i couldn’t get it indexed for 6 months. When it went on googles chats it jumped up to a pr4. Funny actually.

    In my ebook I suggest the exact same thing.

     
    Comment by Stephen Chua
    2008-05-31 11:05:08

    Kenneth, regarding the submission to directories, you are only submitting the home page URL , right?

    Comment by Kenneth Koh
    2008-05-31 12:28:15

    Yes, home page URL and all 1000 submissions use the same anchor text. It’s the worse SEO practice and any typical guru wouldn’t recommend. Just want to test and see what’s the worst case :)

     
     
    Comment by illlushtrator
    2008-06-02 13:01:08

    Well, you didn’t get “jailed” by Google - wildest guess being that “everyone” likes you, LOL…

    Surely Google didn’t want to touch you as an IMer, huh?

    Comment by Steve Wilkie
    2008-08-19 10:20:01

    Hey great news that you didnt get sandboxed…theres hope for us all yet.

    2008-08-19 10:21:30

    I’m gonna go out and do exactly the same now. I love you posts…keep on doing what you do best

     
     
     
    Comment by Gerald
    2008-07-20 22:58:13

    Great information man, I’m new to your site and I already love your informative blog posts! Keep up the good work :)

     
    2008-08-16 02:26:10

    It has come to my attention that most directories have lost PR on the pages where your website will be listed. Most directories have lost PR altogether, others only display PR on the home page. There seems to be no benefit in listing your site in these directories.

    Comment by Kenneth Koh
    2008-08-16 10:51:51

    PR is one thing, but what is more important is whether the page is indexed. As long as you get links from pages that are indexed, that link will be counted, whether it has a PR or not.

    Comment by Sell House Fast Ltd
    2008-08-19 21:25:36

    I can’t believe you didnt get sandboxed, thats great news …well done chum.

     
     
     
    Comment by Simon Leach Subscribed to comments via email
    2008-08-30 06:49:15

    I recently built a life settlement website and followed this exact procedure and definitely got sand boxed after a few weeks. Initially we came out great getting some traffic and surprisingly good SERPS on several top key words. Then after about 4 weeks we dropped off the SERPS like a stone. We still are getting ranked on very low terms but the main terms we are off the radar. My traffic has staid flat for the last 9 weeks.

    Does anyone else find that the Google webmaster tools don’t reflect reality? When I look at those stats it says I rank pretty well on some keywords but I am no where to be found. I wonder if the webmaster tools pull from data that is Pre-sandbox filter. I can but hope that when we emerge we will rise quickly.

    Comment by Kenneth Koh
    2008-08-30 08:39:45

    Simon,

    Google likes to rank new websites with good links high and fast. It assumes that these pages are “current”, something like news. That’s why it wants to rank you high fast. But after a few weeks, it will re-evaluate your page and likely to take your ranking away. That’s normal. What you need to do is to continue building more links to your website and internal pages. You can do it through article marketing. There is no sandbox, as I’ve said. To prove it, you mentioned that you still have some ranking on low terms. If your website is sandboxed, it is jail and why should Google give a prisoner any traffic at all? Reason: there is no jail, no sandbox. It’s all about linking and content.

    Comment by Simon Leach Subscribed to comments via email
    2008-09-09 08:22:15

    Kenneth,

    That is good advice and exactly what we are doing, continuing to build our links especially deep links. I thought the point of the sand box was not to be Prison..it just keeps you away from the juicy terms. I think of it like being bumped back to the minors, if I work hard and improve my game I’ll get a shot back with the majors again.

    Thanks for the advice, I am focussed link building now.

     
     
     
    2008-12-16 18:00:08

    Thanking you for sharing information…………….!

    i will keep to visit your blog later again………..!

     
    Comment by Amit
    2009-03-24 13:55:21
     
    Comment by Johnarc Subscribed to comments via email
    2009-05-07 18:59:42

    Whats the minimum as well as maximum time Google jail one in sandbox.I dont know weather my sitehas been jailed in sandbox or penalised by Google.One day before I got stuck by google,my ranking in search engine for desired keyword was pretty well.All of sudden it disappear.Its strange none of my keywords are listed in search engine & none of them are dropped from there ranking .They are totally disappear.Please reply with your comment about this matter.

     
    Comment by Josh
    2009-05-22 11:38:44

    The minimum would be 0 days in the sandbox. The maximum would be for life such as sites that are known to be spam/scams/fraud by Google.

    I would keep adding content and links to your site. Wait a week or two and check your rankings again

    Good luck - :)

     
    Comment by yvonne
    2009-06-07 05:00:27

    Hi,

    I have learned so much today on your site. I am new to internet marketing and having a website. Keep up the good work and I will be visiting you often.

     
    Comment by Roseanna
    2009-07-28 04:22:24

    Thankyou for as great article. I too am new to SEO on my own website and have definitely been sandboxed. I wonder can anyone tell me if, when you finally get out of it, google webmaster tools suddenly credits you with all the links you have been working upon? I am just keeping my head down and following an inbound only link campaign (same as before) using various terms in anchor text and some non-anchor text links…but webmaster tools has for 7 weeks now not seen a single new link, and is in fact dropping the number of links which it sees..Has anyone else experienced this please?

    Thankyou in advance for any reply.
    Roseanna

     
    Comment by Ajmal
    2009-08-08 07:17:40

    I am new to the world of SEO. I just took on my first major website project and your articles are a definite help.

     
    2009-12-06 12:12:25

    One of my site is had a great start and after 1 month its gone from google radar. I still cannot find any reason. Can anyone please help as how to check my site for google sandbox.

     
    2010-01-23 17:40:41

    Thanks for the info , I just submitted my site to a large amont of directories.So when i read the title i got a little scared that i may be in “jail” But seeing that thats not what happen to you with over 1000 listings i am glad i submitted as many as i did.

     
    Name (required)
    E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
    URI
    Subscribe to comments via email

    Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
    You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> in your comment.